Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Senators Urge DOJ, FTC to Investigate Formula 1’s Exclusion of Andretti-Cadillac
Regulation

Senators Urge DOJ, FTC to Investigate Formula 1’s Exclusion of Andretti-Cadillac

News RoomBy News RoomMay 22, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

A bipartisan group of senators has urged the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether Formula One’s rejection of the Andretti Formula Racing team violated federal antitrust law. 

“(W)e are concerned that Formula One is acting at the behest of its independent teams and other ‘key stakeholders,’ including foreign automakers, to exclude the team formed by Andretti Formula Racing, LLC’s partnership with General Motors (“Team Andretti-Cadillac”) from entering the Formula One Championship series,” the senators wrote Tuesday in a letter to the federal agencies. “It is possible that such a refusal to deal—especially if orchestrated through a group boycott—could violate U.S. antitrust laws.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleUse of SCOTUS Foreign Corporation Ruling Fails in Non-Compete Suit
Next Article A Cautionary Tale: EPA Lists PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances

Related Posts

‘Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction’: Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution

August 22, 2024

Federal, State Antitrust Collaboration Reaches ‘Historic Level,’ Colorado’s Attorney General Says

August 21, 2024

Federal Judge Maintains NY’s Partial Jury Verdict Against Makers of Prevagen; Affirms Use of §63(12)

August 21, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20252 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.