Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Experts weigh in on Karen Read’s lawsuit after criminal trial

July 4, 2025

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 2025

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » No More ‘Yesterday’s Technology Tomorrow’: Judges Consider AI’s Impact on Dispute Resolution
Litigation

No More ‘Yesterday’s Technology Tomorrow’: Judges Consider AI’s Impact on Dispute Resolution

News RoomBy News RoomMay 30, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

In the legal profession, which has a reputation for being slow to embrace technology in the first place, the judiciary isn’t exactly known to be tech-forward.

“The courts are very good at bringing the public yesterday’s technology tomorrow,” quipped Senior Judge Jerome Abrams of Minnesota state court, as he moderated a panel of judges speaking on issues related to artificial intelligence earlier this week. The program, which was sponsored by the ABOTA Foundation, allowed judges to outline their courts’ current policies regarding litigants’ use of AI tools. But in the latter parts of the conversation, Abrams and the panelists discussed how dispute resolution itself soon could be shaped by generative AI.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleDecision of the Day: Legal Fees Necessitated by Subpoena Constitute Concrete Monetary Harm for Standing
Next Article Wachtell, Kirkland Advising on Pending $22.5B Texas Energy Acquisition

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 20250 Views

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 20250 Views

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.