Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Experts weigh in on Karen Read’s lawsuit after criminal trial

July 4, 2025

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 2025

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Decision of the Day: Legal Fees Necessitated by Subpoena Constitute Concrete Monetary Harm for Standing
Litigation

Decision of the Day: Legal Fees Necessitated by Subpoena Constitute Concrete Monetary Harm for Standing

News RoomBy News RoomMay 30, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Solo attorney J. Henry Nierman, a solo practitioner, has owned codefendant Recovery of Judgment LLC since 2015. Miami Beach, Florida resident Shaul Levy sued Nierman’s firm and his company alleging violations of the the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) over the issuance of a purportedly unlawful Subpoena issued in connection with efforts to recover on a $13,990 judgment awarded in a New York City Civil Court case (the Morrison judgment).

U.S. District Judge Nelson Roman of the Southern District of New York denied defendants’ motion to dismiss Levy’s complaint under FRCP 12(b)(1) due to lack of standing. Levy showed concrete harm flowing from the $3,000 expense incurred in retaining counsel to defend him in the Morrison Judgment. He faced imminent risk of legal action stemming from the unlawful subpoena.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleAmerican Arbitration Association Acquires ODR.com Parent Company, Planning AI-Powered Expansion
Next Article No More ‘Yesterday’s Technology Tomorrow’: Judges Consider AI’s Impact on Dispute Resolution

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 20250 Views

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 20250 Views

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.