Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Court-Appointed Attorneys Had Immunity Despite Allegations of ‘Wrongful and Illegal’ Conduct, 8th Circ. Says
Litigation

Court-Appointed Attorneys Had Immunity Despite Allegations of ‘Wrongful and Illegal’ Conduct, 8th Circ. Says

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 7, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has rejected efforts to revive a woman’s lawsuit against attorneys who represented her minor child in custody litigation, concluding that, despite allegations by the plaintiff that their conduct was “wrongful and illegal,” the attorneys had been acting in line with their judicial duties as court-appointed attorneys, and were therefore entitled to immunity.

In an Aug. 7 decision authored by Judge Raymond W. Gruender for the Eighth Circuit, the three-judge panel concluded attorneys from Frankel, Ruben, Klein, Payne & Pudlowski, Dunlop & McCarter, and James D. Reid, Ph.D., LLC were exempt from plaintiff Devon Arseneau’s suit, which accused them of violating her Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, stemming from their representation of her minor child during a custody battle, in which the court granted Arseneau’s ex-husband sole legal custody of their child.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleThe EEOC Is Furloughing Staff. Lawyers Weigh What This Says About Workers’ Rights
Next Article Strategy Sharing and Judicial Elections: What the Pa. Association for Justice’s New President Has Planned for the Year Ahead

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20250 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.