Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » The Battle Over Design Patent Obviousness: Will The ‘Rosen-Durling’ Test Continue To Govern Future Design Patent Obviousness Inquiries?
Intellectual Property

The Battle Over Design Patent Obviousness: Will The ‘Rosen-Durling’ Test Continue To Govern Future Design Patent Obviousness Inquiries?

News RoomBy News RoomMarch 12, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

An en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will soon decide whether to amend its long-standing framework for assessing design patent obviousness, known as the Rosen-Durling test. The forthcoming decision in LKQ v. GM Global Technology Operations, No. 2021-2348 (LKQ) will be the first en banc decision the Federal Circuit has issued in a design patent case since 2008.

On Feb. 5, 2024 the Federal Circuit heard arguments in the rehearing en banc in LKQ, which asks whether and how the obviousness test for design patents should be modified in light of the more flexible approach to obviousness that the Supreme Court endorsed in the utility patent context in KSR International v. Telflex, 550 U.S. 398 (2007) (KSR).

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleWhite & Case Reverses Revenue and Profit Slides, Increasing 2023 Revenue and Profits
Next Article Here’s Everyone Who’s Running for Judge in Georgia

Related Posts

Who Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case

August 22, 2024

E-Commerce Company Alleges Albertsons Stole Trade Secrets to Develop Own Platform

August 20, 2024

How ‘In re Cellect’ and a Proposed Rule Could Affect Double Patenting

August 20, 2024
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20250 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.