Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Supreme Court to take up challenge to TikTok ban
Legal News

Supreme Court to take up challenge to TikTok ban

News RoomBy News RoomDecember 18, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

FreedomWorks chief economist Steve Moore says if you don’t like TikTok, turn it off amid discussion over a possible ban because of its CCP ties on ‘The Bottom Line.’

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will hear arguments over a new law that would ban use of the popular social media app TikTok in the U.S. unless its Chinese parent company allows it to be sold.

Justices said they will hold a special session on Jan. 10 to hear oral arguments in the case – an expedited timeline that will allow them to consider the case just nine days before the Jan. 19 ban is slated to take effect.

The news comes two days after TikTok and its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, filed an emergency application to the high court asking justices to temporarily block the law from being enforced while it appealed a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 

TECH LEADERS BEZOS, ZUCKERBERG, COOK, AND PICHAI LOOK FOR FACE TIME WITH TRUMP   

Former President Donald Trump leaves after speaking at a campaign rally at the Trump National Doral Golf Club on July 09, 2024 in Doral, Florida.  (Joe Raedle/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Lawyers for TikTok have argued that the law passed earlier this year is a First Amendment violation, noting in their Supreme Court request that “Congress’s unprecedented attempt to single out applicants and bar them from operating one of the most significant speech platforms in this nation,” and “presents grave constitutional problems that this court likely will not allow to stand.”

The news comes as President-elect Donald Trump has signaled support for TikTok. On Monday, Trump met with TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew at his Mar-a-Lago resort, telling reporters during a press conference ahead of the meeting his incoming administration will “take a look at TikTok” and on the looming U.S. ban.

“I have a warm spot in my heart for TikTok,” Trump told reporters.

TikTok cited this relationship directly in its emergency filing to the Supreme Court, arguing that an interim injunction “is also appropriate because it will give the incoming Administration time to determine its position, as the President-elect and his advisors have voiced support for saving TikTok.”

“There is a strong public interest that this Court have the opportunity to exercise plenary review,” lawyers for the company said.

The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case comes after Congress passed legislation in April giving TikTok nine months to either divest from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, or be removed from U.S. app stores and hosting services. 

Lawmakers have cited concerns that China could use the app to download user data or otherwise push certain state-backed content on U.S. users. 

GET BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE      

TikTok, ByteDance and several users of the app sued to block the ban in May, arguing that the legislation would suppress free speech for the millions of Americans that use the platform.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleLawsuit reveals how colleges really talk about rich applicants
Next Article Eric Reiersen: How to Choose the Right Personal Injury Lawyer

Related Posts

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20252 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.