Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Supreme Court sides with Starbucks in case over fired pro-union workers
Legal News

Supreme Court sides with Starbucks in case over fired pro-union workers

News RoomBy News RoomJune 13, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Check out what’s clicking on FoxBusiness.com

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a ruling that sided with coffee giant Starbucks in its challenge against a lower court’s order that it rehire seven employees who had been fired amid a unionization push.

In an 8-1 decision, the justices threw out the lower court’s approval of an injunction sought by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that ordered Starbucks to reinstate the workers while the NLRB’s administrative case against the coffee chain proceeds.

The case concerned a group of seven workers at a Starbucks in Memphis, Tennessee, whose store became one of the first to unionize in 2022. During their organizing efforts, they allowed a TV news crew into the store after hours to discuss the campaign — which prompted the company to fire the seven workers present, including some who had been on the union-organizing committee. 

Workers at the store later voted to join the Workers United union, which filed unfair-labor charges against Starbucks through the NLRB. The agency sought an injunction to reinstate the fired workers, arguing that they had been fired illegally due to their union-organizing efforts, which a district court granted and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld before the case reached the Supreme Court.

STARBUCKS FOUNDER SAYS STEVE JOBS TOLD HIM TO FIRE EXECUTIVE TEAM: ‘HE WAS RIGHT’

The Supreme Court sided with Starbucks and issued an 8-1 ruling that lower courts improperly granted an injunction sought by the National Labor Relations Board. (Angus Mordant/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

In an opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas and joined in full by seven other justices, the Court held that the lower courts had failed to use a four-part test in determining whether to grant the injunction, so the injunction was vacated and remanded for it to be reconsidered.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
SBUX STARBUCKS CORP. 80.24 +0.86 +1.08%

A Starbucks spokesperson told in a statement, “Starbucks believes that our partners are the core of our business, and we are committed to providing everyone who wears the green apron a bridge to a better future.” 

STARBUCKS’ ‘FALL FROM GRACE’: HOWARD SCHULTZ SAYS COMPANY NEEDS TO FIX US OPERATIONS

Starbucks protestors

The case involved Starbucks workers who allowed members of the media into a Memphis, Tennessee, Starbucks after hours to promote their unionization push and were then fired. (Guy Smallman/Getty Images / Getty Images)

“We remain focused on making progress toward our goal of reaching ratified contracts for represented stores this year. Consistent federal standards are important in ensuring that employees know their rights and consistent labor practices are upheld no matter where in the country they work and live,” the company added.

Lynne Fox, president of the Workers United union, released a statement saying, “Working people have so few tools to protect and defend themselves when their employers break the law. That makes today’s ruling by the Supreme Court particularly egregious. It underscores how the economy is rigged against working people all the way up to the Supreme Court.”

GET BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

“Starbucks should have dropped this case the day it committed to chart a new path forward with its workers, instead of aligning itself with other giant corporations intent on stifling worker organizing. It’s incongruous to want to build a productive, positive relationship with workers and at the same time lead an attack on one of the few mechanisms they have to defend themselves against unscrupulous employers,” the statement continued.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleThe Hype Behind Harvey: How the Stealthy Startup Is Raising Industry Eyebrows
Next Article Filings in Phila. Paraquat Mass Tort Surge Amid Slowdowns in Federal MDL

Related Posts

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20252 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.