Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Settlement Strategy: Line-by-Line Holt Demand Leads to $1.25M Resolution
Litigation

Settlement Strategy: Line-by-Line Holt Demand Leads to $1.25M Resolution

News RoomBy News RoomMarch 8, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

A pair of Atlanta attorneys has secured a $1.25 million pre-suit settlement for an 82-year-old woman injured in a vehicular collision.

The Beasley Allen duo is now detailing the deliberate step they took when submitting their Holt demand to Allstate Insurance Co. to help reach the six-figure resolution.

‘So She Can Simply Walk’

Beasley Allen attorneys Ken Wilson and Preston Moore joined forces to represent the plaintiff, who’d been riding as a “passenger in a vehicle hit by another car attempting to make a left turn,” according to plaintiff counsel.

The plaintiff had been wearing a seatbelt at the time of the crash, but plaintiff counsel said the severity of the collision ”left her with multiple serious injuries including a broken sternum, broken spinal vertebrae (L2) and exacerbation of existing spondylolisthesis.”

“Her 82-year-old body was subject to numerous tests, examinations, and above all, pain,” Wilson said. “She suffered three days in the hospital wondering if these injuries would permanently take her mobile and active life.”

In addition to enduring 16 weeks of physical therapy as a result of the injury collision, plaintiff counsel said their client now requires in-home care, given her ”increased risk of paralysis if she falls.”

“Our client must put full focus on physical therapy to strengthen herself so she can simply walk without pain like she did prior to this wreck—a goal, given her age, she may never attain,” Moore said. “This also took away her confidence in caring for herself alone.”

‘Category by Category’

Advocating on the plaintiff’s behalf, Moore opted to begin his representation by issuing the defendant driver’s insurer, Allstate Insurance Company, a Holt demand pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67.1.

But it’s what plaintiff counsel detailed in the demand that helped their client’s matter reach resolution without litigation.

“One thing I do that might be a little unique is in all of my Holt demands, I calculate out, category by category, the low-end conservative value of what I believe a DeKalb County jury would … return for each of the tort damages factors under Georgia Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 66.501,” Moore said.

Allstate Corp. (Courtesy photo)

Moore pointed out that the categories included interference with normal living, interference with enjoyment of life, loss of capacity to labor and earn money, impairment of bodily health and vigor, fear of extent of injury, shock of impact, past and future actual pain and suffering, past and future mental anguish and the extent to which the plaintiff must limit activities.

When combined, Moore said the detailed calculation and his firm’s established “reputation for ensuring its clients see the full value of their damages in settlement, or trial if necessary,” helped enable the plaintiff team to resolve the personal injury matter for $1.25 million pre-suit.

“Counsel for the insurance company informed us that was one of the primary reasons they decided to resolve this case pre-suit,” Moore said. “As part of the settlement, Allstate Insurance Company has agreed to pay $100,000 in medical damages.”

‘Settle Cases With Less Evidentiary Showing’

Plaintiff counsel applauded the resolution, but noted their representation of the client had not yet concluded.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleAI, the Billable Hour and Improving Client Service
Next Article Inevitable Disclosure Under DTSA: To Apply or Not To Apply?

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20252 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.