Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Sequoia Capital Taps Ropes & Gray in Trademark Dispute
Intellectual Property

Sequoia Capital Taps Ropes & Gray in Trademark Dispute

News RoomBy News RoomJune 25, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Sequoia Capital Taps Ropes & Gray in Trademark Dispute
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Sequoia Capital LLC, a real estate development compnay, was hit with a trademark infringement lawsuit on June 25 in California Central District Court. The court case was filed by Ropes & Gray on behalf of California-based venture capital firm Sequoia Capital. The court action contends that the defendant’s name is confusing similar to the plaintiff’s marks. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 8:24-cv-01396, Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC v. Sequoia Capital LLC.

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM’s source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.

Read the complaint here:

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleSEC Should Engage Public When Proposing Rules That Exceed Agency Expertise, Former Chair Says
Next Article ‘We Need to Do a Much Better Job’: Lewis Brisbois Held Onto Millions in Old Client Funds, Internal Memo Says

Related Posts

Who Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case

Who Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case

August 22, 2024
E-Commerce Company Alleges Albertsons Stole Trade Secrets to Develop Own Platform

E-Commerce Company Alleges Albertsons Stole Trade Secrets to Develop Own Platform

August 20, 2024
How ‘In re Cellect’ and a Proposed Rule Could Affect Double Patenting

How ‘In re Cellect’ and a Proposed Rule Could Affect Double Patenting

August 20, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20252 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202513 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202516 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202512 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

By News RoomMarch 26, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court recently overturned a felony conviction for aggravated vehicular assault after concluding…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.