Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Returning to Court in a Post-COVID Era: The Pros and Cons of a Virtual Court System
Litigation

Returning to Court in a Post-COVID Era: The Pros and Cons of a Virtual Court System

News RoomBy News RoomMarch 15, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The world as we knew it changed forever at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, precipitating a seismic shift in the legal industry, particularly in the conduct of court proceedings. The closure of businesses, restaurants, schools and government facilities rendered the in-person style of court hearings that we all knew as the normative practice no longer feasible.

Swift Adaptations in Response to Crisis

On March 9, 2020, Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a state of emergency for Florida. Days later, the Florida Supreme Court suspended jury trials due to health and safety concerns caused by COVID-19. The suspension resulted in the cancellation of thousands of hearings and brought civil jury trials in Florida to an abrupt halt. With the judiciary’s functionalities being severely disrupted, the court was required to consider alternative ways to conduct hearings and jury trials while protecting the parties’ rights and the public’s health and safety.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleThis Lawyer Is Becoming a Thorn in the Side of AI Companies
Next Article Arnall Golden Gregory Sees Revenue and PEP Inch Up

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20251 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.