Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Litigator of the (Past) Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Litigation

Litigator of the (Past) Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 14, 20242 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

In the first full trial concerning Nazi-looted art in the U.S., a Baker & Hostetler team led by Oren Warshavsky won possession of a watercolor by Austrian Expressionist painter Egon Schiele for the firm’s clients. The dispute involved three parties, all with Jewish roots, claiming to be the rightful owner of “Portrait of the Artist’s Wife.” After a three-week bench trial, Rochester, New York Supreme Court Justice Daniel Doyle earlier this month found the heirs of Karl Mayländer established title to the artwork. The judge found trial evidence established that Mayländer, a textile merchant and art collector murdered by Nazis, was under duress when his collection came into the possession of an acquaintance. The Baker & Hostetler team included Tatiana Markel, Michelle Usitalo and Victoria Stork.

An appellate team led by Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins got the Eleventh Circuit to uphold a summary judgment win for Home Depot. Members of the retailer’s 401(k) plan sued alleging fiduciary breaches under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. In a 30-page published opinion issued earlier this month, the appellate court held that ERISA plaintiffs bear the burden of proof on loss causation. The court further found that to meet that burden, plaintiffs must show “a hypothetical prudent fiduciary in the same circumstances as the defendant, armed with the information that a proper evaluation would have yielded, would not (or could not) have made the same choice.” Martinez argued the appeal. He was joined by associates Charles Dameron and Brent Murphy and co-counsel David Tetrick Jr. and Darren Shuler of King & Spalding.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleCrowell Plans Rebrand and Hiring Push of Public Affairs Affiliate
Next Article Addleshaw Goddard, DAC Beachcroft Enjoy Strong Profits Growth

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20252 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.