Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Experts weigh in on Karen Read’s lawsuit after criminal trial

July 4, 2025

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 2025

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Lawyers who voided Elon Musk’s ‘excessive’ Tesla pay package want $6 billion fee
Legal News

Lawyers who voided Elon Musk’s ‘excessive’ Tesla pay package want $6 billion fee

News RoomBy News RoomApril 16, 20244 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

OLeary Ventures Chairman Kevin OLeary reacts to Elon Musk being forced to testify in the SECs probe into his purchase of Twitter on The Big Money Show.

The lawyers who voided Elon Musk’s $56 billion Tesla compensation package as being excessive are seeking a record $6 billion legal fee payable in the company’s stock.

“We recognize that the requested fee is unprecedented in terms of absolute size,” the three law firms said in a filing with the Delaware Court of Chancery. The law firms said the fee works out to an hourly rate of $288,888 for representing Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta in the lawsuit to rescind the massive compensation package.

The lawyers’ request comes over a month after a Delaware judge voided Musk’s $56 billion pay package because his close ties with the directors who approved the deal weren’t fully disclosed to shareholders and the package’s performance targets were easier for Musk to meet than the company acknowledged. The $56 billion package was the largest ever provided to the CEO of a publicly traded U.S. company, although Musk wasn’t guaranteed any salary.

“The lawyers who did nothing but damage Tesla want $6 billion,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter. “Criminal.”

ELON MUSK’S $56 BILLION PAY PACKAGE VOIDED BY JUDGE

Tesla CEO Elon Musk slammed the $6 billion fee request from the shareholder’s lawyers. (Slaven Vlasic/for The New York Times / Getty Images)

The EV maker is being asked to pay the legal fee because it benefited from Musk’s pay package being voided, which the lawyers say will result in the return of 266 million shares of stock.

“This structure has the benefit of linking the award directly to the benefit created and avoids taking even one cent from the Tesla balance sheet to pay fees,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the fee would be tax deductible for the company.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 157.11 -4.37 -2.71%

Tesla may object to the legal fee requested by the law firms as it did with the fee requested in a similar case that challenged its directors’ pay.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

ELON’S EXODUS: TRACKING MUSK’S BUSINESS INCORPORATION STATE CHANGES

Teslas CEO Elon Musk in a car in Beijing, China

Tesla’s $56 billion pay package for CEO Elon Musk was voided by a Delaware court in January. (Tingshu Wang / Reuters Photos)

The largest settlements in shareholder cases have historically occurred in federal court. The biggest fee was $688 million in 2008 for the legal team that obtained a $7.2 billion settlement in a securities fraud case over the failure of Enron.

The Tesla fee request comes as the Delaware Supreme Court considers an appeal of a $267 million fee in a case that settled for $1 billion involving Dell technologies.

Delaware judges have said that firms pursuing cases deep into litigation, through depositions and toward trial, should get a higher percentage of the recovery to reflect the risk and effort. The case involving Musk’s Tesla compensation package went to a one-week trial.

ELON MUSK MOVES SPACEX TO TEXAS AFTER DELAWARE REVOKED HIS TESLA SALARY PACKAGE

A logo of Tesla

Tesla may object to the $6 billion fee sought by the shareholder’s legal team. (Wang Zhao/AFP via / Getty Images)

Opponents of this approach argue that as settlements and judgments grow in size, attorneys should collect a declining percentage to avoid overcompensation. The legal team in the Musk case said the requested $6 billion fee represents about 11% of the judgment.

Under the terms of his compensation plan, Musk was granted access to stock options that let him buy Tesla stock at heavily discounted prices and he was required to hold the stock for five years. The shareholder’s legal team said they were seeking stock without restrictions on selling it.

GET BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The shareholder’s legal team consists of three law firms – Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Friedman Oster & Tejtel, both of New York, and Andrews & Springer of Wilmington.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleForced to Sue? $2.36M Atlanta Slip-and-Fall Judgment to Be Contested Before Court of Appeals
Next Article Meet the Law Firms Behind the Major Gasoline Antitrust Class Action

Related Posts

Experts weigh in on Karen Read’s lawsuit after criminal trial

July 4, 2025

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 2025

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025
Latest Articles

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 20250 Views

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 20250 Views

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20252 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.