Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Judge allows lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X against left-wing Media Matters to proceed
Legal News

Judge allows lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X against left-wing Media Matters to proceed

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 30, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Check out what’s clicking on FoxBusiness.com.

A federal judge in Texas on Thursday allowed a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk’s X against the liberal group Media Matters to proceed to trial after denying the group’s dismissal request.

Musk’s X filed the suit against Media Matters in November after the group published a report that showed pro-Nazi posts and antisemitic or otherwise hateful content on the platform appearing next to advertisements from major U.S. corporations. Several companies, including Apple, IBM, Comcast and Lionsgate Entertainment, paused their advertising in response to the controversy.

X pushed back on Media Matters’ report, saying the group “completely misrepresented the real user experience” on the platform and manipulated the algorithms that curate users’ feeds to get “racist, incendiary content” to appear next to large advertisers’ paid posts. Attorneys representing the company said the report was “intentionally deceptive” and caused financial harm.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor of the Northern District of Texas ruled that X had Media Matters’ request to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds and what it viewed as X’s failure to state a claim was faulty and dismissed the request. 

ELON MUSK’S X FILES LAWSUIT AGAINST MEDIA MATTERS, ALLEGES MANIPULATION OF DATA ON PLATFORM

A lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X accuses Media Matters of tortious interference with existing contracts and prospective economic advantage, as well as business disparagement. (Richard Bord/WireImage / Getty Images)

The judge found that because Texas-based companies including AT&T and Oracle were among the blue-chip advertisers targeted in the Media Matters report, X’s suit could proceed in the district. 

Among the claims contained in X’s suit against Media Matters are tortious interference with existing contracts, business disparagement and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. Judge O’Connor ruled that X’s claims were plausible and allowed them to proceed.

ELON MUSK CALLS MEDIA MATTERS ‘EVIL PROPAGANDA MACHINE’ AHEAD OF LAWSUIT

Social media platform X

X saw several prominent advertisers leave the platform amid the controversy. (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The judge’s ruling noted that the two Media Matters employees who are defendants in the suit didn’t deny that they were aware of the alleged manipulation and were undertaking activities aimed at driving away advertisers from X. The two employees had argued the report was not connected to Texas despite the inclusion of AT&T and Oracle in articles on the subject.

Media Matters has defended its reporting and previously said that the lawsuit was frivolous. reached out to Media Matters for comment.

GET BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The judge’s decision to reject Media Matters’ motion to dismiss X’s lawsuit sets up a trial that is expected to proceed in April 2025.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleLawyers who sued to void Musk’s Tesla pay plan unlikely to get ‘windfall’ fees
Next Article Independent grocers urge antitrust enforcement rather than ‘price gouging’ push

Related Posts

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20252 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.