Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Illinois Appellate Court Affirms $176K Judgment in Favor Insured Whose Diamond Ring Replaced With Synthetic One
Litigation

Illinois Appellate Court Affirms $176K Judgment in Favor Insured Whose Diamond Ring Replaced With Synthetic One

News RoomBy News RoomApril 26, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Illinois Appellate Court Affirms 6K Judgment in Favor Insured Whose Diamond Ring Replaced With Synthetic One
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

In an insurance dispute, the Illinois First District Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment awarding a woman $176,356 after her husband replaced the diamond in her 3.57 carat engagement ring with a synthetic one, finding she was entitled coverage as an “innocent insured.”

In an April 22 opinion, authored by Judge Mary Ellen Coghlan, the appellate court affirmed the Cook County Circuit Court’s decision entering a judgment in favor of plaintiff Chrysoula Dana, who filed a complaint against Great Northern Insurance Co., for declaratory judgment and breach of contract after it denied coverage for the loss of her engagement ring diamond.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleHow I Made Law Firm Leadership: ‘Every Lawyer’s Currency Is Their Own Practice,’ Says Jason Novak of Norton Rose Fulbright
Next Article We Need Cameras in Court Now More Than Ever

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024
Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s 0K Harassment Judgment

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024
Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20252 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202514 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202516 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202514 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

By News RoomMarch 26, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court recently overturned a felony conviction for aggravated vehicular assault after concluding…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.