Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Experts weigh in on Karen Read’s lawsuit after criminal trial

July 4, 2025

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 2025

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Hitting ‘Pause’ on the Corporate Transparency Act: Part I
Regulation

Hitting ‘Pause’ on the Corporate Transparency Act: Part I

News RoomBy News RoomMay 31, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The Corporate Transparency Act (the CTA) requires business entities newly created pursuant to state law to fully and publicly identify their beneficial owners.  This recent federal enactment (and the even more recent Department of Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder) is intended to thwart criminals, terrorists, and other evildoers who might cloak their nefarious schemes behind the mundane facades of seemingly legitimate corporations, limited partnerships, and LLCs.

Notwithstanding its lofty objective, the statutory regime has been severely questioned by those who claim that it ranges far beyond Congress’s authority to legislate.  See U.S. Const., art. I, § 8.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleJury Awards $1.8M, Not Rejected $60K, for Broken Pinky Finger
Next Article Minnesota Supreme Court Uphold Abortion Rights, Decline Anti-Abortion Relitigation Attempts Following Historic Ruling

Related Posts

‘Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction’: Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution

August 22, 2024

Federal, State Antitrust Collaboration Reaches ‘Historic Level,’ Colorado’s Attorney General Says

August 21, 2024

Federal Judge Maintains NY’s Partial Jury Verdict Against Makers of Prevagen; Affirms Use of §63(12)

August 21, 2024
Latest Articles

AT&T settles lawsuits over data breaches: How to get a payment

June 25, 20250 Views

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 20250 Views

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.