Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Harvard College and Ward, Smith & Hill File Patent Infringement Suit Against Samsung
Intellectual Property

Harvard College and Ward, Smith & Hill File Patent Infringement Suit Against Samsung

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 7, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Harvard College and Ward, Smith & Hill File Patent Infringement Suit Against Samsung
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Harvard College filed a complaint on Monday against Samsung, accusing the consumer electronics giant of using its patented technology to create components included in devices such as the Galaxy smartphones.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleged that Samsung  violated two patents for processes developed by Harvard chemist Roy G. Gordon and his colleagues. Gordon’s work includes development of processes used commercially to make thin films for semiconductor electronics and other items, it said.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleThe Path to Equity Partnership Is Lengthening. Are Firms Making the Change in Good Faith?
Next Article Record Number of Mass Claims Filed in EU in 2023, According to New Report

Related Posts

Who Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case

Who Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case

August 22, 2024
E-Commerce Company Alleges Albertsons Stole Trade Secrets to Develop Own Platform

E-Commerce Company Alleges Albertsons Stole Trade Secrets to Develop Own Platform

August 20, 2024
How ‘In re Cellect’ and a Proposed Rule Could Affect Double Patenting

How ‘In re Cellect’ and a Proposed Rule Could Affect Double Patenting

August 20, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20252 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202513 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202516 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202512 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

By News RoomMarch 26, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court recently overturned a felony conviction for aggravated vehicular assault after concluding…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.