Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Federal Judge Affirms Creditor’s Motion to Enforce $6.4M Garnishment Against Cannabis Retailer
Litigation

Federal Judge Affirms Creditor’s Motion to Enforce $6.4M Garnishment Against Cannabis Retailer

News RoomBy News RoomMarch 8, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Federal Judge Affirms Creditor’s Motion to Enforce .4M Garnishment Against Cannabis Retailer
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

A federal judge in Maryland has denied debtors’ attempts to vacate a $6.4 million garnishment order under the guise that the contract suit was outside of federal court jurisdiction due to the involvement of marijuana—an illegal substance.

U.S. District Judge Brendan A. Hurson for the District of Maryland denied Mackie Barch and Trellis Holdings’ motion to vacate the court’s charging order against Trellis’ membership interest in garnishee Culta, concluding that relief wasn’t warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(4), because the charging order wasn’t void for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, the debtors failed to show that extraordinary circumstances existed, according to Hurson’s March 5 decision.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleWomen in Big Law: Progress, Challenges and the Road Ahead
Next Article Too Fast? Personal Injury Suit Puts Spotlight on Amazon’s Delivery Quotas

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024
Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s 0K Harassment Judgment

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024
Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20252 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202514 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202516 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202514 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

By News RoomMarch 26, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court recently overturned a felony conviction for aggravated vehicular assault after concluding…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.