Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » EEOC’s Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Rules Follow Title VII Regarding Abortion, Lawyers Say
Regulation

EEOC’s Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Rules Follow Title VII Regarding Abortion, Lawyers Say

News RoomBy News RoomMay 6, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Republican states challenging federal regulations providing for time off for an abortion under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act will face a substantial hurdle as the rule mirrors well-established practice under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, employment attorneys said Monday.

When drafting the PWFA, Congress used the phrase “pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions” from Title VII , as amended by the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, said Kate Mueting, of Sanford Heisler Sharp. The law defines “pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions” to include abortion, she added.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleJudges Must Be Ready for Growing Trend of Climate-Related Litigation, Jurist Tells Colleagues
Next Article Activision Owes Acceleration Bay $23.4M for Multiplayer Gaming Patent Infringement, Jury Says

Related Posts

‘Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction’: Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution

August 22, 2024

Federal, State Antitrust Collaboration Reaches ‘Historic Level,’ Colorado’s Attorney General Says

August 21, 2024

Federal Judge Maintains NY’s Partial Jury Verdict Against Makers of Prevagen; Affirms Use of §63(12)

August 21, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20251 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.