Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Don’t Make It a Memory Test: Let Jurors in New York Have Written Copies of the Court’s Instructions
Litigation

Don’t Make It a Memory Test: Let Jurors in New York Have Written Copies of the Court’s Instructions

News RoomBy News RoomJune 18, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

As the country waited for the verdict in former President Donald Trump’s criminal case in Manhattan a few weeks ago, pundits and citizens alike were busy speculating about the outcome. And late in the first day of deliberations, they got a glimmer of information: the jury had sent a note out to Justice Juan Merchan with some requests.

Jason P.W. Halperin, partner at in Mintz. Courtesy Photo

Among requests for pieces of testimony to be read back, the jury also asked to re-hear certain parts of the jury instructions. Because the Court and the attorneys were not immediately clear which instructions the jury wanted read back, Justice Merchan decided to dismiss the jury for the day and ask them the next day to clarify which instructions they wanted to re-hear.

Erin Galliher, senior associate at Mintz. Courtesy Photo

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleSmokeball Launches Free Product Partnership With Texas State Bar
Next Article The 2024 NLJ 500: Ranking the States

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20251 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.