Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Cosmetics Brands Rejoice (For Now): Required Calif. Cancer Warning for Titanium Dioxide Likely Misleading
Litigation

Cosmetics Brands Rejoice (For Now): Required Calif. Cancer Warning for Titanium Dioxide Likely Misleading

News RoomBy News RoomJune 17, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), which is the agency tasked with implementing Proposition 65, has listed one very specific form of titanium dioxide on Proposition 65’s list of chemicals. Only airborne and unbound particles of respirable size titanium dioxide (Listed Titanium Dioxide) is on Proposition 65’s list. OEHHA listed that specific form of titanium dioxide as cancer-causing in humans, thus mandating a cancer warning on products containing it.

In the lawsuit The Personal Care Products Council v. Rob Bonta, E.D. Cal., Case No. 2:23-cv-01006-TLN-JDP, U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley has temporarily stopped the filing of new Proposition 65 lawsuits based on Listed Titanium Dioxide. The Judge’s preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiff was based on the fact that science does not support the conclusion Listed Titanium Dioxide causes cancer in humans, contrary to Proposition 65’s required (and misleading) cancer warning.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleJapanese Firms Lead as Kirin Offers $1.4B to Make Fancl Whole
Next Article UnitedLex Faces Copyright Suit for Allegedly Using Software Application Without a License

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20251 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.