Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Corporate Regulation and Deregulation After the 2024 Presidential Election
Regulation

Corporate Regulation and Deregulation After the 2024 Presidential Election

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 6, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

With all eyes focused on the politics and inside-the-beltway drama surrounding the next presidential election—and it can hardly be said that this election season has so far lacked drama—the candidates’ fundamental policy differences that could impact business are being overlooked. While the focus is on the electoral horse race, what people should be focused on is the next presidential administration’s policies, and especially those policies respecting the administrative state.

This applies even more so to those who advise corporations and allied institutions on the political and legal landscape impacting their industry. “After all, the chief business of the American people is business.” Calvin Coolidge, The Press Under a Free Government, Address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors, (January 17, 1925).

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleChild Protective Law Doesn’t Entitle Mother to Recover Against Agency For Son’s Fatal Neglect, 3rd Circ. Rules
Next Article Big Bucks Plus Big Responsibility? A-List Firms Are Finding Balance—and Scores Aren’t Getting Any Lower

Related Posts

‘Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction’: Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution

August 22, 2024

Federal, State Antitrust Collaboration Reaches ‘Historic Level,’ Colorado’s Attorney General Says

August 21, 2024

Federal Judge Maintains NY’s Partial Jury Verdict Against Makers of Prevagen; Affirms Use of §63(12)

August 21, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20252 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.