Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Colo. Supreme Court: Law Firm’s ‘Reimbursement Agreement’ With Departing Attorney Violates Ethics Rules
Litigation

Colo. Supreme Court: Law Firm’s ‘Reimbursement Agreement’ With Departing Attorney Violates Ethics Rules

News RoomBy News RoomJanuary 20, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Colo. Supreme Court: Law Firm’s ‘Reimbursement Agreement’ With Departing Attorney Violates Ethics Rules
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

A law firm’s “reimbursement agreement,” requiring a departing attorney to pay over $1,000 per client he retained, violated Colorado ethics rules because it restricts an attorney’s right to practice and a client’s right to counsel of his or her choice, the Supreme Court for the State of Colorado held this week.

On Tuesday, the high court held that Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 5.6(a) prohibits agreements requiring a lawyer departing a firm pay it an undifferentiated per-client fee for continued representation of those clients. Permitting agreements like it would violate important public policy interest, the court said.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleAndrew Cuomo Sues to Obtain Documents from State AG’s Sexual Harassment Inquiry
Next Article ‘To Those Dedicated Customers of Spirit, This One’s for You’: JetBlue’s $3.8 Billion Acquisition of Spirit Airlines Blocked by Federal Judge

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024
Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s 0K Harassment Judgment

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024
Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20255 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202517 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202517 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202517 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

Court Overturns Vehicular Assault Conviction: ‘Utility Vehicle’ Does Not Meet Definition of ‘Motor Vehicle’

By News RoomMarch 26, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court recently overturned a felony conviction for aggravated vehicular assault after concluding…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2026 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.