Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Children Whose DNA Is Entered Into Ancestry.com Are Not Bound to Website’s Arbitration Agreement, Rules Seventh Circuit
Litigation

Children Whose DNA Is Entered Into Ancestry.com Are Not Bound to Website’s Arbitration Agreement, Rules Seventh Circuit

News RoomBy News RoomFebruary 16, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Children Whose DNA Is Entered Into Ancestry.com Are Not Bound to Website’s Arbitration Agreement, Rules Seventh Circuit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The Seventh Circuit concluded that children whose parents had activated DNA test kits for them on Ancestry.com were not bound to Ancestry’s arbitration agreement, concluding the parents had not signed an agreement on behalf of the children.

Parents who activated DNA test kits on Ancestry.com for their children filed suit after another business acquired Ancestry, contending Ancestry violated their privacy rights by disclosing confidential genetic information. Ancestry moved to compel arbitration, arguing the DNA processing consent terms contain a dispute resolution provision which binds the parties to arbitration and waives any class actions.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleHinshaw & Culbertson Faces $5.5 Million Negligence Lawsuit in Miami
Next Article ‘Don’t Be Scared’: Attorneys Talk Navigating Ethical Pitfalls of AI in Legal Practice

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024
Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s 0K Harassment Judgment

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024
Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20252 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202513 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202516 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202512 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

By News RoomAugust 6, 2024

The top two spots, with Munger Tolles at No. 1 and Ropes & Gray at…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.