Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Launch Trade Secrets Complaint Against Uber’s Audiovisual-Recording Technology
Intellectual Property

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Launch Trade Secrets Complaint Against Uber’s Audiovisual-Recording Technology

News RoomBy News RoomJune 28, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft have partnered with a Boston-based firm to file a complaint in Massachusetts on behalf of a small startup company against Uber, alleging that the multinational ride-hailing company defrauded and reverse-engineered its audiovisual-recording technology that helps mitigate concerns of passenger safety.

Zemcar Inc., doing business as Grip Mobility Co., filed the complaint in the Suffolk Superior Court on June 7, alleging that Uber illegally acquired its trade secrets after the companies partnered for a pilot program testing Grip’s “Sentinel” application in Brazil. Grip is asking the court for damages, restitution and to enjoin Uber from continuing to use its confidential and proprietary information.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleUPHELD: Texas Law Banning Gender Medical Care for Trans Children
Next Article Rising PFAS Lawsuits, Increased Regulation Put the Squeeze on Defendants

Related Posts

Who Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case

August 22, 2024

E-Commerce Company Alleges Albertsons Stole Trade Secrets to Develop Own Platform

August 20, 2024

How ‘In re Cellect’ and a Proposed Rule Could Affect Double Patenting

August 20, 2024
Latest Articles

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20250 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20252 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.