Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’
Legal News

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

News RoomBy News RoomMay 8, 20253 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

 Moffettnathanson Research co-founder and senior analyst Craig Moffett discusses the impact of trade negotiations on the company on The Claman Countdown.

Apple requested that a federal appeals court temporarily pause a district judge’s ruling requiring it to allow more competition in the Apple App Store, arguing it will suffer irreparable harm if the decision isn’t paused.

A district court judge ordered Apple to ease restrictions on app developers after holding Apple in contempt of an order issued in a 2020 antitrust lawsuit that was brought by Epic Games, the creator of the video game Fortnite. 

Among those was a 27% fee that Apple assessed on app developers when customers make a purchase outside the App Store, as well as restricting the location of where developers can display links for users to make purchases outside the app.

The tech giant said in a Wednesday filing with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the district court’s order “permanently precludes Apple from exercising control over core aspects of its business operations, including charging for use of its property and protecting the integrity of its platforms and in-app purchase mechanisms.”

SPOTIFY UPDATING APP FOR US USERS AFTER COURT RULING IN APPLE CASE

Apple says the injunction will cost it “substantial sums annually” if the ruling isn’t overturned. (Photographer: Brent Lewin/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

“These restrictions, which will cost Apple substantial sums annually, are based on conduct that has never been adjudicated to be (and is not) unlawful; rather, they were imposed to punish Apple for purported non-compliance with an earlier state-law Injunction that is itself invalid,” the company argued in the filing.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
AAPL APPLE INC. 196.25 -2.26 -1.14%

Epic Games said in a statement that Apple’s motion is a “last ditch effort to block competition and extract massive junk fees at the expense of consumers and developers.”

EU HANDS APPLE, META MASSIVE FINES DESPITE WARNINGS FROM TRUMP

“Since the contempt of court decision was issued by the District Court, Apple has faced a surge of genuine competition as developers have updated their apps with better payment methods, better deals, and better consumer choice – all benefiting U.S. consumers as the 2021 injunction originally intended,” the Epic Games statement continued. “We are full speed ahead to bring Fortnite to iPhones and iPads in the U.S. this week.”

The App Store icon on a phone

The court is requiring Apple to drop restrictions on app developers using its App Store. ((Photo by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images) / Getty Images)

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her ruling that “Apple sought to maintain a revenue stream worth billions in direct defiance of this court’s injunctions.”

GET BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

She added that Apple misled the court about its efforts to comply with her injunction and referred the company and one of its executives to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleMicrosoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

Related Posts

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 2025

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 2025

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 2025
Latest Articles

Microsoft scores win in FTC challenge to company’s Activision Blizzard acquisition

May 7, 20250 Views

Spotify updating app for US users in wake of Apple case ruling

May 2, 20256 Views

Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis closes North Carolina store amid flag dispute

April 26, 20252 Views

Court wins lead to wins for US oil and gas energy infrastructure

April 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.