Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On

Seven charged in $100M California jewelry heist, largest in US history

June 19, 2025

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 2025

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 2025

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 2025

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » A Unique Law Firm Persuaded a Judge to Rule Against Biden’s Navy Secretary
Litigation

A Unique Law Firm Persuaded a Judge to Rule Against Biden’s Navy Secretary

News RoomBy News RoomJuly 1, 20241 Min Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

A federal judge has ruled against President Joe Biden’s Navy secretary and ordered the military branch to at least explain in greater detail why it had denied sailor Ronny Rutledge’s request to reinstate his Navy SEAL status.

The military’s Board for Correction of Naval Records “relied on the undisputed fact that Rutledge had been counseled numerous times without addressing Rutledge’s core contention that these counselings were improper, erroneous, and engineered to exact revenge for his suspected whistleblowing,” U.S. District Judge Christopher R. “Casey” Cooper wrote in his memorandum opinion. “Even under the relaxed standard of review, this sort of summary denial that skips over the petitioner’s primary allegation does not pass muster.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleWhich Law Firms Are On Course to be in the Global Elite?
Next Article Appellate Court Reverses Missouri Gym-Goer’s $1M Personal Injury Verdict, Claims Barred by Assumption of Risk

Related Posts

Miami Judge Threatened: Perpetrator Gets 20 Years in Prison

August 23, 2024

Lawsuit Says NYS Assembly Refuses To Certify Ex-Legislative Director’s $100K Harassment Judgment

August 23, 2024

Judge Grants Sanctions Request Against IT Consulting Company Following ‘Egregious’ Document Production Behavior

August 23, 2024
Latest Articles

States challenge bankrupt 23andMe’s right to auction genetic information

June 11, 20250 Views

Jimmy Buffett’s widow battles co-trustee over $275 million trust

June 6, 20252 Views

Longtime Hardee’s franchisee sues chain over franchise agreement dispute

May 29, 20253 Views

Apple warns ruling in App Store case may cost ‘substantial sums annually’

May 8, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

By News RoomApril 16, 2024

For the full 2024 Am Law 100 report, click here. For more ways to analyze the…

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

August 6, 2024

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.