Close Menu
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's On
Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

Trump administration backs Bayer’s Supreme Court bid on Roundup lawsuits

December 3, 2025
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 2025
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 2025
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 2025
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Legal MagLegal Mag
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Technology
  • More
    • Firms
    • Law Practice
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Legal MagLegal Mag
Home » 8 Tips for Businesses to Achieve Compliance and Avoid Fines Under the CPRA’s Data Minimization Requirements
Regulation

8 Tips for Businesses to Achieve Compliance and Avoid Fines Under the CPRA’s Data Minimization Requirements

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 16, 20242 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
8 Tips for Businesses to Achieve Compliance and Avoid Fines Under the CPRA’s Data Minimization Requirements
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The majority of CPRA amendments took effect on Jan. 1, 2023, and introduced new data minimization obligations into the CCPA. As a result, the CCPA now requires a business’ collection, use, retention, and sharing of a California resident’s personal information to be “reasonably necessary and proportionate to achieve the purposes for which the personal information was collected or processed, or for another disclosed purpose that is compatible with the context in which the personal information was collected, and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes.” (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100(c)). Businesses that fail to comply with the CCPA could face litigation that is damaging to the organization’s finances and reputation. Moreover, non-compliance can also lead to fines of up to $2,500 per violation or $7,500 for violations that are intentional or involve children, with each impacted consumer potentially giving rise to a separate violation.

Businesses that have not finalized their compliance programs have some relief. The amendments that the CPRA introduced shall not be enforced until July 1, 2023, and regulators cannot look back to violations occurring before this date to enforce any provision added or amended by the CPRA (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185(d)). But July is just a few short months away, and compliance with the amended CCPA, in particular the data minimization requirements, will likely take businesses significant time and resources.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleLawsuit Alleges Courthouse Security Gave Away Phone, Leading to Publication of Intimate Photos, Videos
Next Article Plaintiffs Attorneys, Automaker Cut Deal to Amend California’s Lemon Law

Related Posts

‘Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction’: Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution

‘Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction’: Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution

August 22, 2024
Federal, State Antitrust Collaboration Reaches ‘Historic Level,’ Colorado’s Attorney General Says

Federal, State Antitrust Collaboration Reaches ‘Historic Level,’ Colorado’s Attorney General Says

August 21, 2024
Federal Judge Maintains NY’s Partial Jury Verdict Against Makers of Prevagen; Affirms Use of §63(12)

Federal Judge Maintains NY’s Partial Jury Verdict Against Makers of Prevagen; Affirms Use of §63(12)

August 21, 2024
Latest Articles
Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

Bessent warns Supreme Court tariff ruling would hurt American people

December 3, 20252 Views
New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

New MCA Payment Tool Helps Entrepreneurs Ease Cash Flow Challenges During National Entrepreneurship Month

November 13, 202513 Views
Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

Autumn Budget Likely to Increase Pressure on SMEs, New Survey Warns

November 12, 202516 Views
Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

Pension Contribution Deadline 2026: How to Use Carry Forward to Save £18,000 in Tax

November 1, 202512 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

The 2024 A-List: Top 20 Firms

By News RoomAugust 6, 2024

The top two spots, with Munger Tolles at No. 1 and Ropes & Gray at…

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue

April 16, 2024
Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

Defending Claims Where Extreme Weather Is to Blame: Our Changing Climate’s Impact on Civil Litigation

July 18, 2024
© 2025 Legal Mag. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.