By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Reading: Two Noteworthy Decisions: Motion to Quash a Subpoena and Recreational Cannabis
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
The Law Firms that Missed Out on the UBS-Credit Suisse Deal Tells Us Plenty
7 hours ago
It’s Life in the Fast Lane for VW Canada’s New General Counsel
7 hours ago
When Are 2 Properties Really 1? Unity of Use Doctrine Under Eminent Domain Code
19 hours ago
Boies Schiller, Squire Patton Third DCA Defeat Opens FPL to Billions of Dollars in Damages
22 hours ago
‘This is Downright Orwellian’: Florida Attorneys React to DeSantis Signing ‘Tort Reform’ Bill into Law
1 day ago
Aa
Legal MagLegal Mag
Aa
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.
Legal Mag > Blog > Litigation > Two Noteworthy Decisions: Motion to Quash a Subpoena and Recreational Cannabis
Litigation

Two Noteworthy Decisions: Motion to Quash a Subpoena and Recreational Cannabis

Press Room
Press Room 1 month ago
Updated 2023/02/21 at 4:40 PM
Share
SHARE

This column addresses recent noteworthy decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. This installment discusses a recent decision by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart granting a defendant’s motion to quash a deposition subpoena issued to the company’s former in-house counsel as well as a decision by U.S. District Court Judge Gary L. Sharpe denying a motion to dismiss a preliminary injunction he previously entered enjoining certain aspects of New York state’s retail cannabis licensing program.

Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart Grants Defendant’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued to Former In-House Counsel. The first decision addressed in this installment explores the circumstances under which a defendant’s former in-house counsel can be deposed in an ongoing litigation. In In re Hoosick Falls PFOA Cases, No. 1:19-MC-00118 (LEK/DJS), 2013 WL 1858081 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2023), plaintiffs sought to depose the former in-house counsel, Lauren Alterman, of defendant Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. (Saint-Gobain) in ongoing litigation concerning Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) contamination in Hoosick Falls, New York. Alterman served as in-house counsel to Saint-Gobain until 2008, when she accepted a new role as vice president of environmental, health, and safety (EHS) at the company. The PFOA contamination in Hoosick Falls was discovered in 2014.

You Might Also Like

When Are 2 Properties Really 1? Unity of Use Doctrine Under Eminent Domain Code

Boies Schiller, Squire Patton Third DCA Defeat Opens FPL to Billions of Dollars in Damages

‘This is Downright Orwellian’: Florida Attorneys React to DeSantis Signing ‘Tort Reform’ Bill into Law

‘That’s the Rub’: Georgia Punitive Damages Cap Ruling Divides Lawyers

Is U.S. Supreme Court Ready to Review Incentive Awards to Class Reps?

Press Room February 21, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Print
Previous Article Data Explosion Is Helping Businesses Thrive but Also Leaving Them Vulnerable to ‘Crushing Defeat’
Next Article Florida Court Orders Trial Judge to Disqualify Herself
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Latest News

The Law Firms that Missed Out on the UBS-Credit Suisse Deal Tells Us Plenty
Firm Management
It’s Life in the Fast Lane for VW Canada’s New General Counsel
General Counsel
When Are 2 Properties Really 1? Unity of Use Doctrine Under Eminent Domain Code
Litigation
Boies Schiller, Squire Patton Third DCA Defeat Opens FPL to Billions of Dollars in Damages
Litigation

You Might Also Like

Litigation

When Are 2 Properties Really 1? Unity of Use Doctrine Under Eminent Domain Code

19 hours ago
Litigation

Boies Schiller, Squire Patton Third DCA Defeat Opens FPL to Billions of Dollars in Damages

22 hours ago
Litigation

‘This is Downright Orwellian’: Florida Attorneys React to DeSantis Signing ‘Tort Reform’ Bill into Law

1 day ago
Litigation

‘That’s the Rub’: Georgia Punitive Damages Cap Ruling Divides Lawyers

1 day ago
about us

We influence 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet.

  • My Bookmarks
  • Customize Interests
  • Home
    • Home 2
    • Home 3
    • Home 4
  • Posts
    • Post Layouts
    • Gallery Layouts
    • Video Layouts
    • Audio Layouts
    • Post Sidebar
    • Review
      • User Rating
    • Content Features
    • Table of Contents
  • Pages
    • Blog Index
    • Search Page
    • 404 Page
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • Categories
  • Bookmarks
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Blog Index
    • Sitemap

Find Us on Socials

© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?