By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Reading: The Metaverse of Products Liability: Are Tech Companies ‘Products’?
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration
1 hour ago
Legal Speak at Legalweek 2023: Lex Machina’s Karl Harris and Casepoint’s Jessica Robinson
4 hours ago
Phillips 66 Topped Off Tank of New GC for Forfeiting Stock at Norfolk Southern
4 hours ago
‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit
8 hours ago
Generative AI’s Role in the Courts: The Morning Minute
10 hours ago
Aa
Legal MagLegal Mag
Aa
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.
Legal Mag > Blog > Litigation > The Metaverse of Products Liability: Are Tech Companies ‘Products’?
Litigation

The Metaverse of Products Liability: Are Tech Companies ‘Products’?

Press Room
Press Room 2 months ago
Updated 2023/01/17 at 6:56 PM
Share
SHARE

Products liability claims have long focused on physical products. As technology advances and software and social media play an ever-expanding role in our lives, novel products liability theories have emerged targeting social media platforms, software developers, and purveyors of new technologies on the grounds that these tech companies are “product sellers” and their communication platforms are “products.” However, these novel claims test the limits of products liability law and run afoul of basic products liability principles, as tech companies are not product sellers and the electronic communication platforms they offer are not products within the meaning of products liability law.

Contents
Section 230 ImmunityNew Use of an Old Theory

Section 230 Immunity

Tech companies enjoy broad protection from liability for online content posted to their social media platforms and electronic communication forums under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. Section 230 immunizes these platforms and forums from liability for the content of their users’ posts. As most claims arising from the alleged misuse of social media or posting of potentially tortious content online concern the content itself, Section 230 has consistently been applied to protect tech companies from liability for claims based on the content of social media and electronic communication forums. Indeed, Section 230 has been used successfully as a shield against liability since before many of today’s largest tech companies were even founded.

New Use of an Old Theory

You Might Also Like

Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration

‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit

9th Circuit: Seattle Landlords Can Inquire About Tenants’ Criminal History

White & Case Ends New Client’s Two Decades International Dispute with $32M Verdict

Pa. Supreme Court Completes U-Turn on Validity of Household Exclusion

Press Room January 17, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Print
Previous Article Tracking Generative AI: How Evolving AI Models Are Impacting Legal
Next Article Senior Australian Financial Regulator to Join Vanguard as General Counsel
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Latest News

Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration
Litigation
Legal Speak at Legalweek 2023: Lex Machina’s Karl Harris and Casepoint’s Jessica Robinson
Legal Technology
Phillips 66 Topped Off Tank of New GC for Forfeiting Stock at Norfolk Southern
General Counsel
‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit
Litigation

You Might Also Like

Litigation

Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration

1 hour ago
Litigation

‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit

8 hours ago
Litigation

9th Circuit: Seattle Landlords Can Inquire About Tenants’ Criminal History

11 hours ago
Litigation

White & Case Ends New Client’s Two Decades International Dispute with $32M Verdict

14 hours ago
about us

We influence 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet.

  • My Bookmarks
  • Customize Interests
  • Home
    • Home 2
    • Home 3
    • Home 4
  • Posts
    • Post Layouts
    • Gallery Layouts
    • Video Layouts
    • Audio Layouts
    • Post Sidebar
    • Review
      • User Rating
    • Content Features
    • Table of Contents
  • Pages
    • Blog Index
    • Search Page
    • 404 Page
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • Categories
  • Bookmarks
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Blog Index
    • Sitemap

Find Us on Socials

© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?