By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Reading: For Whom the Bell Tolls: COVID Executive Orders Are Still Being Interpreted
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration
2 hours ago
Legal Speak at Legalweek 2023: Lex Machina’s Karl Harris and Casepoint’s Jessica Robinson
5 hours ago
Phillips 66 Topped Off Tank of New GC for Forfeiting Stock at Norfolk Southern
5 hours ago
‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit
8 hours ago
Generative AI’s Role in the Courts: The Morning Minute
11 hours ago
Aa
Legal MagLegal Mag
Aa
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.
Legal Mag > Blog > Litigation > For Whom the Bell Tolls: COVID Executive Orders Are Still Being Interpreted
Litigation

For Whom the Bell Tolls: COVID Executive Orders Are Still Being Interpreted

Press Room
Press Room 2 months ago
Updated 2023/01/27 at 3:32 PM
Share
SHARE

On March 20, 2020, at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, then-governor Andrew Cuomo issued Executive Order No. 202.8, declaring that “any specific time limit for the commencement, filing or service of any legal action, notice, motion… is hereby tolled,” until April 19, 2020. Cuomo subsequently issued nine executive orders that extended the tolling or suspension of statutes of limitation and filing periods under New York law.

These follow-on executive orders stated that the “suspensions, and modifications of law” made in prior executive orders would continue. Most of the subsequent executive orders, however, did not use the word “toll,” unlike the initial Executive Order No. 202.8. Two of the executive orders did use the word “toll,” including Executive Order 202.67 issued on Oct. 4, 2020, which referenced that Executive Order No. 202.8 “tolled” time limits for commencing actions and other filings, and stated that for any civil case, “such suspension” would only be effective until Nov. 3, 2020, after which, “any such time limit will no longer be tolled.”

You Might Also Like

Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration

‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit

9th Circuit: Seattle Landlords Can Inquire About Tenants’ Criminal History

White & Case Ends New Client’s Two Decades International Dispute with $32M Verdict

Pa. Supreme Court Completes U-Turn on Validity of Household Exclusion

Press Room January 27, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Print
Previous Article The Danger Lurking in Dark Data and the Importance of Strong Information Governance
Next Article NY Trial Lawyers Association Head Blasts ‘Archaic’ Wrongful Death Statute, Boosts Chief Judge Hopeful
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Latest News

Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration
Litigation
Legal Speak at Legalweek 2023: Lex Machina’s Karl Harris and Casepoint’s Jessica Robinson
Legal Technology
Phillips 66 Topped Off Tank of New GC for Forfeiting Stock at Norfolk Southern
General Counsel
‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit
Litigation

You Might Also Like

Litigation

Representing Uber, Jenner & Block Urges 2nd Circuit to Find that Rideshare Drivers Are Not Exempt from Arbitration

2 hours ago
Litigation

‘Sufficiently Reliable and Relevant’ Expert Testimony Survives Southwest’s Motion to Exclude in Customers’ Class-Certification Suit

8 hours ago
Litigation

9th Circuit: Seattle Landlords Can Inquire About Tenants’ Criminal History

11 hours ago
Litigation

White & Case Ends New Client’s Two Decades International Dispute with $32M Verdict

14 hours ago
about us

We influence 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet.

  • My Bookmarks
  • Customize Interests
  • Home
    • Home 2
    • Home 3
    • Home 4
  • Posts
    • Post Layouts
    • Gallery Layouts
    • Video Layouts
    • Audio Layouts
    • Post Sidebar
    • Review
      • User Rating
    • Content Features
    • Table of Contents
  • Pages
    • Blog Index
    • Search Page
    • 404 Page
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • Categories
  • Bookmarks
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Blog Index
    • Sitemap

Find Us on Socials

© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?