By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Legal MagLegal Mag
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Reading: Florida Dietary Advice Dispute Goes to Supreme Court
Share
Notification Show More
Latest News
Bankman-Fried’s Effort ‘to Reconnect’ with FTX GC Creates Furor in Criminal Case
29 mins ago
A ‘Bellwether’ Year for Life Sciences: The Morning Minute
42 mins ago
The Rise of ChatGPT: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Legal Profession
8 hours ago
Cleary Gottlieb, Vinson & Elkins Guide Puerto Rican Power Contract
12 hours ago
Shearman (And Others) Playing Catch Up
15 hours ago
Aa
Legal MagLegal Mag
Aa
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
  • Home
  • Firm Management
  • Legal Technology
  • General Counsel
  • Litigation
  • Regulation
  • Deals & Transactions
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.
Legal Mag > Blog > Litigation > Florida Dietary Advice Dispute Goes to Supreme Court
Litigation

Florida Dietary Advice Dispute Goes to Supreme Court

Press Room
Press Room 6 months ago
Updated 2022/08/12 at 3:59 PM
Share
SHARE

A woman who operated a health and nutrition coaching business asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to take up a First Amendment challenge to a Florida law that blocked her from providing dietary advice to clients.

Heather Kokesch Del Castillo, a Northwest Florida resident, was cited by the state Department of Health in 2017 for getting paid to provide dietary advice without being a licensed dietitian or nutritionist.

That spurred a legal battle in which Del Castillo, represented by attorneys from the Institute for Justice national legal group, contended that Florida violated her speech rights. A federal district judge and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the state, prompting her to file a petition Thursday at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The petition said, in part, that the state’s restrictions are “rife with holes and exceptions.”

“Heather’s advice would have been perfectly legal, for example, if she had been selling nutrition supplements instead of just selling advice and encouragement,” the petition said. “In other words, taking five dollars as compensation for telling someone ‘eating fewer carbohydrates will help you lose weight’ is a crime, but telling that same person ‘you can lose weight if you eat fewer carbohydrates and give me five dollars for this miraculous pill’ is perfectly legal.”

But in a February ruling, a three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the law’s “licensing scheme for dieticians and nutritionists regulated professional conduct and only incidentally burdened Del Castillo’s speech. Because the burden on her speech rights was only incidental, the act’s licensing scheme did not violate her First Amendment free speech rights.”

The petition said Del Castillo provided dietary advice while operating her business, Constitution Nutrition, in California. After her husband, a U.S. Air Force airman, was transferred to Florida, she planned to continue the business.

But a licensed dietitian complained to the Department of Health after seeing an ad in a magazine, the petition said. The department ordered Del Castillo to stop providing dietary advice and to pay $754 in fines and fees, prompting the lawsuit.

In the U.S. Supreme Court petition, Del Castillo’s attorneys argued that the ruling by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals conflicted with decisions by appellate courts in other parts of the country about how the First Amendment applies to licensing laws.

It pointed to an “incoherent jumble of differing rules governing when the government can regulate speech, including speech on the internet.”

“In Florida, Heather has no First Amendment right to communicate with her clients,” the petition said. “If she goes home to California, it’s different. If she goes north to the Carolinas, it’s different. If she goes west to Mississippi, it’s different. In a nation with communication services, including coaching and advice, increasingly being provided across state lines, patchwork precedent on a question as fundamental as ‘Does the First Amendment even apply?’ calls for this (Supreme) Court’s intervention.”

Copyright 2022 News Service of Florida. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

You Might Also Like

Judge: New York Must Pay Cuomo’s Legal Bills in Trooper’s Federal Harassment Case

Discovery Peril Leads Executive on Failed International Forum Shopping Gambit

Consumers Claim Apple Devices Tracked User Activity Despite Data Sharing Settings

Skadden Defends Flagstar Bancorp in Data Breach Suit

After Half a Lifetime Spent on the Bench, Judge Wolfson Prepares for What’s Next

Press Room August 12, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Print
Previous Article New York Ticketing Regime Amended To Enhance Consumer Protections
Next Article New Law Firm Leases Trade Square Footage for Prime Locations, Views and Amenities
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Latest News

Bankman-Fried’s Effort ‘to Reconnect’ with FTX GC Creates Furor in Criminal Case
General Counsel
A ‘Bellwether’ Year for Life Sciences: The Morning Minute
Deals & Transactions
The Rise of ChatGPT: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Legal Profession
Legal Technology
Cleary Gottlieb, Vinson & Elkins Guide Puerto Rican Power Contract
Deals & Transactions

You Might Also Like

Litigation

Judge: New York Must Pay Cuomo’s Legal Bills in Trooper’s Federal Harassment Case

2 days ago
Litigation

Discovery Peril Leads Executive on Failed International Forum Shopping Gambit

2 days ago
Litigation

Consumers Claim Apple Devices Tracked User Activity Despite Data Sharing Settings

2 days ago
Litigation

Skadden Defends Flagstar Bancorp in Data Breach Suit

3 days ago
about us

We influence 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet.

  • My Bookmarks
  • Customize Interests
  • Home
    • Home 2
    • Home 3
    • Home 4
  • Posts
    • Post Layouts
    • Gallery Layouts
    • Video Layouts
    • Audio Layouts
    • Post Sidebar
    • Review
      • User Rating
    • Content Features
    • Table of Contents
  • Pages
    • Blog Index
    • Search Page
    • 404 Page
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • Categories
  • Bookmarks
    • Customize Interests
    • My Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Blog Index
    • Sitemap

Find Us on Socials

© 2022 All Rights Reserved. Legal Magazine.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?