The recent decision in California upholding Proposition 22 does not immunize the rideshare industry from tort liability. This statute, and efforts by Uber and Lyft to enact similar legislation across the country, raise important questions for wrongful injury cases here in Pennsylvania and nationwide.
Proposition 22 was enacted in California by ballot initiative after gig economy behemoths like Uber and Lyft sunk over $200 million into the campaign. The statute, the App-Based Drivers as Contractors and Labor Policies Initiative, exempts rideshare drivers from numerous state laws around wages, hours, and other employment conditions. Labor advocates immediately challenged the law, arguing that it violated various provisions of the state constitution. On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled in Castellanos v. California that Proposition 22 was constitutional.
